Abstract
AbstractPersistent inequalities in access to community-based support limit opportunities for independent living for older people with care needs in Europe. Our study focuses on investigating how gender, widowhood and living arrangement associate with the probability of receiving home and community-based care, while accounting for the shorter-term associations of transitions into widowhood (bereavement) and living alone, as well as the longer–term associations of being widowed and living alone. We use comparative, longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (collected between 2004 and 2015 in 15 countries) specifying sex-disaggregated random-effects within-between models, which allow us to examine both cross-sectional and longitudinal associations among widowhood, living arrangements and community-based care use. We find widowhood and living alone are independently associated with care use for both older women and men, while bereavement is associated with higher probability of care use only for women. Socio-economic status was associated with care use for older women, but not for men in our sample. The gender-specific associations we identify have important implications for fairness in European long-term care systems. They can inform improved care targeting towards individuals with limited informal care resources (e.g. bereaved older men) and lower socio-economic status, who are particularly vulnerable to experiencing unmet care needs. Gender differences are attenuated in countries that support formal care provision, suggesting gender equity can be promoted by decoupling access to care from household and family circumstances.
Funder
austrian science fund
svenska forskningsrådet formas
canadian institutes of health research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Health (social science)
Reference60 articles.
1. Albertini M, Pavolini E (2015) Unequal inequalities: the stratification of the use of formal care among older Europeans. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 72(3):510–521. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv038
2. Allison PD (2009) Fixed effects regression models. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412993869
3. Arber S, Davidson K, Ginn J (2003) Changing approaches to gender in later life. In: Arber et al. (ed.) Gender and ageing: changing roles and relationships: changing roles and relationships. McGraw-Hill Education, London (UK)
4. Ariaans M, Linden P, Wendt C (2021) Worlds of long-term care: a typology of OECD countries. Health Policy 125(5):609–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.009
5. Bakx P, De Meijer C, Schut F, Van Doorslaer E (2015) Going formal or informal, who cares? The influence of public long-term care insurance. Health Econ 24(6):631–643. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3050
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献