Abstract
AbstractBy mitigating the negative effects of urbanization, urban trees contribute significantly to the well-being of urban citizens. However, trees themselves are also exposed to urban stress that can influence tree condition and tree-herbivore interactions. Maple species (Acerspp.) are among the most commonly planted trees in urban areas throughout North America and Europe. Among these species, field, sycamore, and Norway maple are native to Europe, but tolerate environmental stress to varying degrees. Here, we compared the phytophagous insect communities in the canopy of these tree species in the city of Budapest, Hungary. We also examined the stress level [expressed as peroxidase (POD) enzyme activity], and physiological condition (expressed as degree of leaf necrosis and leaf fall) of the maple trees, and their relationship to herbivore abundance. We observed higher total abundance of phytophagous insects on field and sycamore maple compared to Norway maple. Most herbivorous species were associated with field maple, sycamore had the highest aphid densities, and Norway maple harbored the least specific phytophagous insect community. Field maple trees were in the best condition while Norway maple trees in the worst condition, i.e., with the highest proportion of necrotic leaf surface area. The super-abundant planthopper species,Metcalfa pruinosapositively affected the POD activity of trees, but did not influence their condition. On the contrary,M. pruinosaabundance was driven by tree condition, with higher numbers on healthier trees. Our findings suggest that the abundance of phytophagous insects in the canopy of maple trees is highly determined by tree condition, and in this study field maple had the highest and Norway maple the lowest tolerance for urban stress.
Funder
Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal
Ministry for Innovation and Technology
ELKH Centre for Ecological Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Insect Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference88 articles.
1. Alma A, Ferracini C, Burgio G (2005) Development of a sequential plan to evaluate Neodryinus typhlocybae (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Dryinidae) population associated with Metcalfa pruinosa (Say) (Homoptera: Flatidae) infestation in northwestern Italy. Environ Entomol 34:819–824. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-34.4.819
2. Bach A, Pawłowska B (2006) Effect of sodium chloride salinity and pH of soil on ornamental urban trees in Kraków with regard to nature conservation in cities. Ecol Chem Eng A 13:455–461
3. Barczak T, Bennewicz J, Korczyński M, Błażejewicz-Zawadzińska M, Piekarska-Boniecka H (2021) Aphid assemblages associated with urban park plant communities. Insects 12:173. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12020173
4. Basset Y, Aberlenc H-P, Springate ND, Delvare G (1997) A review of methods for sampling arthropods in tree canopies. In: Stork NE, Adis JA, Didham RK (eds) Canopy arthropods. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 27–52
5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x