Author:
Riedl René,Stieninger Mark,Muehlburger Manuel,Koch Stefan,Hess Thomas
Abstract
AbstractIn the past years we have observed enormous adoption and use of digital technologies in almost all domains of human life. In this context, researchers and practitioners have been using the term “digital transformation” (DT) to characterize phenomena related to the changes caused by increased use of digital technologies. The progression and contributions of corresponding discussions significantly depend on a common understanding and conceptualization of DT. Accordingly, the information systems research community has started working toward conceptual clarity. Importantly, the current debate focuses on theoretical contributions by academic researchers. Hence, data on the practitioners’ perspective on DT is missing. Against this background, we investigated general understandings of DT in practice. Our analysis comprises data of N = 529 business decision-makers in the UK. Our results show a significant discrepancy between science (i.e., conceptualizations and definitions of DT in the academic literature) and practice (i.e., business decision-makers’ perceptions and corresponding survey responses). Specifically, for a large proportion of the respondents their decision to classify concrete digitalization examples from the literature as DT or no DT was largely independent of the degree of organizational change caused by the use of digital technologies. This is a surprising result, as high-caliber academic literature proposes this degree to be a critical factor to characterize DT. Another key finding is that a remarkable number of practitioners consider a digitalization initiative as DT based on the mere occurrence of specific buzzwords related to digital technologies in the corresponding descriptions. In particular, the buzzword “digital technology” led the survey participants to classify a definition as instance for DT. We discuss implications of our results and limitations.
Funder
University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Akmajian A, Farmer AK, Bickmore L, Demers RA, Harnish RM (2017) Linguistics: an introduction to language and communication, 7th edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
2. Andriole SJ (2017) Five myths about digital transformation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 58(3):20–22
3. Bartunek JM, Rynes SL (2014) Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: the paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. J Manag 40(5):1181–1201
4. Blanka C, Krumay B, Rueckel D (2022) The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: a design science approach. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 178(4):121575
5. Chen S, King J (2022) Policy and imprecise concepts: the case of digital transformation. JAIS 22(2):401–407
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献