Abstract
AbstractIn this article the progress of the research on cement hydration mechanisms is critically reviewed, starting with the work of Le Chatelier and Michaelis during the late nineteenth century. Proposed mechanisms are discussed in the light of experimental data to highlight the role of new or improved analytical techniques. The focus of this article lies on the dormant period and the silicate reaction. Today many of the mechanisms proposed throughout time cannot withstand experimental evidence and need to be rejected, including the classical protective hydrate layer theory. However, it seems likely that hydrated surface species are involved in the mechanism. Theories that aim to explain the rate changes solely based on the nucleation and growth of portlandite can also not withstand experimental evidence. Nevertheless, the retardation of portlandite crystal growth through silicate ions is a relevant factor. Especially since it might present a mechanism for the nucleation of calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H), backing up theories that propose C–S–H and portlandite to grow from the same nuclei. Finally, an overview over facts, that are currently considered to be valid and hence need to be regarded in the future mechanisms is given.
Funder
Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science
Reference151 articles.
1. Desch C H (1918) The mechanism of the setting process in plaster and cement. In: Swinburn J (ed), Transactions of the faraday society: proceedings of the first international symposium on the chemistry of cements in London, 14th ed., pp 1–7
2. Scrivener K, Ouzia A, Juilland P, Kunhi Mohamed A (2019) Advances in understanding cement hydration mechanisms. Cement Concr Res 124:105823
3. Dorn T, Blask O, Stephan D (2022) Acceleration of cement hydration – A review of the working mechanisms, effects on setting time, and compressive strength development of accelerating admixtures. Constr Build Mater 323:126554
4. Scrivener KL, John VM, Gartner EM (2016) Eco-efficient cements: potential, economically viable solutions for a low-CO2, cement-based materials industry. UNEP Rep 114:2–26
5. Chen C, Habert G, Bouzidi Y, Jullien A (2010) Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation. J Clean Prod 18:478–485
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献