Abstract
AbstractThe phenomenological method (or rather, methods) has been fruitfully used to study the experience of illness in recent years. However, the role of illness is not merely that of a passive object for phenomenological scrutiny. I propose that illness, and pathology more generally, can be developed into a phenomenological method in their own right. I claim that studying cases of pathology, breakdown, and illness offer illumination not only of these experiences, but also of normal function and the tacit background that underpins it. In particular, I claim that the study of embodiment can be greatly enhanced, and indeed would be incomplete, without attending to bodily breakdown and what I term bodily doubt. I offer an analogy between illness and Husserl’s epoché, suggesting that both are a source of distancing, and therefore motivate a reflective stance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Abernethy, Amy, and Jane Wheeler. 2008. Total dyspnoea. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care 2 (2): 110–113.
2. Albom, Mitch. 2003. Tuesdays with Morrie: an old man, a young man, and life’s greatest lesson. London: Time Warner Books.
3. Barnes, Elizabeth. 2016. The minority body. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bauby, Jean-Dominique. 2007. The diving bell and the butterfly. London: Harper Perennial.
5. Canguilhem, Georges. 1991. The normal and the pathological. New York: Zone Books.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献