Abstract
AbstractThis introductory essay discusses how the trope of “religious violence” is operative in contemporary discussions concerning the so-called “return of religion” and the “post-secular constellation.” The author argues that the development of a genuine phenomenology of “religious violence” calls on us to critically reconsider the modern discourses that all too unambiguously tie religion and violence together. In a first part, the paper fleshes out the fault lines of a secularist modernity spinning out of control. In a second part, it demonstrates how the “liberal imaginary” revolves around individualist conceptions of freedom and sovereignty that, on their part, become parasitic upon imaginations of disorder, otherness and (especially religious) violence. In a third part, the author demonstrates how these insights call for developing a transformed phenomenological framework in order to give a more sensible account of “religious violence.” Finally, in presenting the articles gathered in this “special issue” of Continental Philosophy Review, some pathways into such a sensibilized phenomenology of “religious violence” are outlined.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference91 articles.
1. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2002. Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others. American Anthropologist 104(3): 783–790.
2. Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (trans: Heller-Roazen, Daniel). Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
3. Allen, Amy. 2017. The End of Progress. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. Appadurai, Arjun. 2006. Fear of Small Numbers. An Essay in the Geography of Anger. Durham: Duke University Press.
5. Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.