How Society Changes: Sociological Enlightenment and a Theory of Social Evolution for Freedom

Author:

Tada MitsuhiroORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis article clarifies the relationship between individual freedom and social order by relying on Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory and thereby defines sociology’s contribution to social evolution as sociological enlightenment, which seeks otherwiseness in living experience and action. For this purpose, Luhmann’s theory will specifically be compared with Emile Durkheim’s and Alfred Schutz’s sociological theories. Durkheim, a “child of the Enlightenment,” considered freedom a collective ideal of moral individualism and conceived that the rational state realizes freedom by spreading the civil-religious human ideal for modern social order. In contrast, Schutz, following Henri Bergson, who criticized rationality for spatially fixing inner time, regarded freedom as a given in the individual’s underlying duration, not as a shared ideal. Yet, unlike Bergson, he continued relying on rationalism, and he thought that the sociological observer observes how something appears to people with the epoché of natural attitude, not what it objectively is. Inheriting this phenomenological subjectivism, Luhmann showed that the self-referentiality of consciousness also applies to society: A social system, which path-dependently emerges itself from a double contingency, observes the world in its own way based on its self-referentially constituted eigen-time. On account of this system closure, and contrary to Durkheim’s illuminist belief, there is no controlling entity in a highly evolved society, where freedom results from the enlarged, diversified possibilities of living experience and action (contingency). Thus, sociological enlightenment doubts self-evidence so that society brackets the taken-for-granted social order or social reality and amplifies individuals’ deviations to evolve toward freedom.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference82 articles.

1. Adachi, S. (2013). Riberaru nashonarizumu to tabunka shugi: Igirisu no shakai tōgō to musurimu (Liberal nationalism and multiculturalism: Social integration policy and Muslims in Britain). Tokyo: Keisōshobō.

2. Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

3. Arthur, B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York: Free Press.

4. Badie, B., & Birnbaum, P. ([1979] 1982). Sociologie de l’État, new edition with a preface. Paris: Grasset.

5. Baecker, D. (1999). Gypsy reason: Niklas Luhmann’s sociological enlightenment. Cybernetics & Human Knowing: A Journal of Second-Order Cybernetics, Autopoiesis & Cyber-Semiotics, 6(3), 5–19.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3