Abstract
AbstractThe societal changes of the last century, especially in the aftermath of World War II, have led thinkers to imagine philosophical anthropology centred on the concept of hope. From very different perspectives, authors such as Ernst Bloch, Erich Fromm, and Hannah Arendt understood that hope is deeply connected with the condition and destiny of humanity. Various sociologists have developed concepts closely linked with hope: action, social change, utopia, revolution, emancipation, innovation, and trust. However, a coherent and systematic analysis is yet to emerge. Taking up the threads of this rich but fragmented reflection, this paper intends to outline the traits of a “sociology of hope” as a tool for critically interpreting today’s society and the processes of change crisscrossing it, starting from some crucial questions: Who are the actors and historical bearers of hope? What are the main socio-historical forms of hope? What social, political, and cultural conditions favour the emergence and strengthening of this disposition? What are the effects and consequences on personal and social life?
Funder
Università degli Studi di Salerno
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference89 articles.
1. Adorno, T. W. (1981). Negative dialectics. Continuum. (original work published 1966).
2. Alagna, M. D. (2011). For “sated” people no future blooms. The concept of “Sättigung” in Max Weber’s Work. Max Weber Studies, 11(2), 249–266.
3. Alexander, J. (2002). The meanings of social life. Oxford University Press.
4. Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. The University of Chicago Press.
5. Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future. Six exercises of political thought. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献