Author:
Schmitz Andreas,Hamann Julian
Abstract
AbstractThis article develops an integrative perspective on the nexus between power and sociological research methods. By reflecting upon two of the most widely used methodological approaches in sociology – standardized survey research and qualitative interview research – we develop a comprehensive heuristic framework for examining the ways in which the use of sociological methods affects and intersects any social scientific practice: (1) the power effects that societies and institutional settings exert on methods and the use of methods, (2) power in the use and implementation of methods, and (3) the power effects that methods and the use of methods exert on societies and institutional settings.
Funder
GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference109 articles.
1. Adorno, T. W. (1976). Sociology and Empirical research. In T. W. Adorno, R. Dahrendorf, H. Pilot, H. Albert, J. Habermas, & K. R. Popper (Eds.), The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology (pp. 68–86). Heinemann
2. Ahl, H. (2007). A Foucauldian Framework for Discourse Analysis. In H. Neergaard, J. Parm, & Ulhøi (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship (pp. 216–250). Edward Elgar
3. Anderson, M., & Fienberg, S. E. (2000). Race and ethnicity and the controversy over the US Census. Current Sociology, 48(3), 87–110
4. Anyan, F. (2013). The Influence of Power Shifts in Data Collection and Analysis Stages: A Focus on Qualitative Research Interview. The Qualitative Report, 18(36), 1–9
5. Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera’s Immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 304–325
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献