Abstract
Abstract
Gene drives are potentially ontologically and morally disruptive technologies. The potential to shape evolutionary processes and to eradicate (e.g. malaria-transmitting or invasive) populations raises ontological questions about evolution, nature, and wilderness. The transformative promises and perils of gene drives also raise pressing ethical and political concerns. The aim of this article is to arrive at a better understanding of the gene drive debate by analysing how ontological and moral assumptions are coproduced in this debate. Combining philosophical analysis with a critical reading of the gene drive literature and an ethnographic study of two leading research groups, the article explores the hypothesis that the development of and debate about gene drives are characterized by a particular intervention-oriented mode of coproduction. Based on the results of this exploration, we highlight the need for a broadening of the perspective on gene drives in which empirical, moral, and ontological concerns are addressed explicitly in their interplay rather than in (disciplinary) isolation from each other.
Funder
Wageningen University and Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference161 articles.
1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016) Gene drives on the horizon: Advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values. Committee on Gene Drive Research in Non-Human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct. Available online: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/23405/gene-drives-on-the-horizon-advancing-science-navigating-uncertainty-and
2. Champer J, Buchman A, Akbari OS (2016) Cheating evolution: Engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations. Nat Rev Genet 17:146–159. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2015.34
3. Esvelt KM, Smidler AL, Catteruccia AL, Church GM (2014) Emerging Technology: Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations. eLife 3:e03401. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03401
4. DiCarlo JE, Chavez A, Dietz SL, Esvelt KM, Church GM (2015) Safeguarding CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives in yeast. Nat Biotechnol 33:1250–1255. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3412
5. Gantz VM, Bier E (2015) The mutagenic chain reaction: A method for converting heterozygous to homozygous mutations. Science 348(6233):442–444. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5945
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献