How Extreme Is the Precautionary Principle?

Author:

Hansson Sven OveORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe precautionary principle has often been described as an extreme principle that neglects science and stifles innovation. However, such an interpretation has no support in the official definitions of the principle that have been adopted by the European Union and by the signatories of international treaties on environmental protection. In these documents, the precautionary principle is a guideline specifying how to deal with certain types of scientific uncertainty. In this contribution, this approach to the precautionary principle is explicated with the help of concepts from the philosophy of science and comparisons with general notions of practical rationality. Three major problems in its application are discussed, and it is concluded that to serve its purpose, the precautionary principle has to (1) be combined with other decision principles in cases with competing top priorities, (2) be based on the current state of science, which requires procedures for scientific updates, and (3) exclude potential dangers whose plausibility is too low to trigger meaningful precautionary action.

Funder

Royal Institute of Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference79 articles.

1. Durodié B (2003) The true cost of precautionary chemicals regulation. Risk Anal 23:389–398

2. Nilsson R (2004) Control of chemicals in Sweden: an example of misuse of the ‘precautionary principle’. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 57:107–117

3. Castro D, McLaughlin M (2019) Ten ways the precautionary principle undermines progress in artificial intelligence. Working paper, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. https://itif.org/publications/2019/02/04/ten-ways-precautionary-principle-undermines-progress-artificial-intelligence

4. Graham JD (2004) The perils of the precautionary principle: lessons from the American and European experience. Heritage Letters #818, January 15 2004. Heritage Foundation

5. Wainwright D (1998) Disenchantment, ambivalence, and the precautionary principle: the becalming of British health policy. Int J Health Serv 28(3):407–426

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3