Performance paradox of dynamic matching models under greedy policies

Author:

Ana Bušić,Arnaud Cadas,Josu DoncelORCID,Jean-Michel Fourneau

Abstract

AbstractWe consider the stochastic matching model on a non-bipartite compatibility graph and analyze the impact of adding an edge to the expected number of items in the system. One may see adding an edge as increasing the flexibility of the system, for example, asking a family registering for social housing to list fewer requirements in order to be compatible with more housing units. Therefore, it may be natural to think that adding edges to the compatibility graph will lead to a decrease in the expected number of items in the system and the waiting time to be assigned. In our previous work, we proved this is not always true for the First Come First Matched discipline and provided sufficient conditions for the existence of the performance paradox: despite a new edge in the compatibility graph, the expected total number of items can increase. These sufficient conditions are related to the heavy-traffic assumptions in queueing systems. The intuition behind this is that the performance paradox occurs when the added edge in the compatibility graph disrupts the draining of a bottleneck. In this paper, we generalize this performance paradox result to a family of so-called greedy matching policies and explore the type of compatibility graphs where such a paradox occurs. Intuitively, a greedy matching policy never leaves compatible items unassigned, so the state space of the system consists of finite words of item classes that belong to an independent set of the compatibility graph. Some examples of greedy matching policies are First Come First Match, Match the Longest, Match the Shortest, Random, Priority. We prove several results about the existence of performance paradoxes for greedy disciplines for some family of graphs. More precisely, we prove several results about the lifting of the paradox from one graph to another one. For a certain family of graphs, we prove that there exists a paradox for the whole family of greedy policies. Most of these results are based on strong aggregation of Markov chains and graph theoretical properties.

Funder

Hezkuntza, Hizkuntza Politika Eta Kultura Saila, Eusko Jaurlaritza

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Universidad del País Vasco

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3