Abstract
AbstractThe article is based on an observation that there are significant and non-arbitrary similarities between two, seemingly quite distant, theories that address the problem of linguistic categorization. One is the theory of open texture put forward by a prominent legal philosopher, Herbert L.A Hart. The other is the theory of prototypes, originated from psychological research by Eleanor Rosch and developed by cognitively-oriented linguists, most notably Charles Fillmore, George Lakoff, and Ronald Langacker. Firstly, the origins of the open texture theory are presented, including the discussion of Friedrich Waismann's and Ludwig Wittgenstein's ideas and their impact on Hart's theory. Secondly, Hart's theory of open texture is examined, based on several articles and his masterpiece: The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1961). Thirdly, a brief introduction to the prototype theory is provided, focusing on its reception in Cognitive Linguistics. Fourthly, a comparison of both theories is presented, including a sketch of a broader philosophical and historical background, as well as a detailed analysis of similarities and dissimilarities between them. The comparison results in a conclusion that, on linguistic grounds, the open texture theory can be viewed as an anticipation of prototype theory. Finally, several reservations are made in order to avoid possible confusions and some obvious objections.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Language and Linguistics
Reference50 articles.
1. Austin, John L. 1961 (1946). Other Minds. In: Philosophical Papers, eds. Urmson, J. O. and G. J. Warnock, 44–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bajcic, Martina. 2017. New Insights into the Semantics of Legal Concepts and the Legal Dictionary. Amsterdam: John Benjamin's Publishing.
3. Ben-Yami, Hanoch. 2017. Vagueness and Family Resemblance. In A Companion to Wittgenstein, ed. Hans-Johann Glock and John Hyman, 407–419. Hoboken: Wiley.
4. Bix, Brian. 1991. H. L. A. Hart and the ‘Open Texture’ of Language. Law and Philosophy 10(1): 51–72.
5. Bunikowski, Dawid. 2016. The Origins of Open Texture in Language and Legal Philosophies in Oxford and Cambridge. Rechtshteorie 47: 1–24.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献