Facts and Rules: Incidence of the Social Environment in the Understanding and Elaboration of Law, from the Communicational Theory of Law

Author:

Sánchez Hidalgo Adolfo J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe Communicational Theory of Law (CTL) usually differentiates between Legal Sociology and Legal Theory, in the sense that Legal Sociology is concerned with the social validity of the rules and Legal Theory with the formal or legal validity of the rules. It can be argued that both disciplines are two different perspectives of the same empirical reality (legal rules). Also, legal System and social milieu are two closely linked realities; they cannot be separated because they need each other. The Law is the form or order that the social milieu takes, and, at the same time, the social environment provides the ideas, collective representations and other matters that need a legal regulation. For this reason, the epistemological separation between Sociology and Legal Theory must be overcome when the theoretical perspective comes to legal decisions. Thus, the decisional moment becomes the meeting point between the legal System and the social milieu. This is where the concept of the legal System fulfils its main function, as it allows for the dynamism and adaptability of the legal order. The hermeneutic re-elaboration of the normative texts will be the channel through which the social facts and other material elements can inform the meaning or possible interpretations of the rules and institutions of the legal order. This happens primarily by influencing theoretical and doctrinal works of an expository and didactic nature; and secondarily by influencing the decisions of legal operators and courts. This study seeks to explain how the social context influences legal decisions and the formation of the legal System, from a communicational perspective of Law. In order to do so, it will be necessary to set out two epistemological premises of CTL: the semiotic tripartition of the Theory of Law and the legal Order-legal System distinction.

Funder

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades

Universidad de Córdoba

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference23 articles.

1. Albert, José. 2018. “Perspectivas metodológicas en la Teoría Comunicacional del Derecho”, in. Comunicación, lenguaje y Derecho. Contribuciones a la Teoría Comunicacional del Derecho, eds. Liliana Ortiz and Gregorio Robles, 297–314. Cizur Menor: Aranzadi.

2. Bertea, Stefano. 2009. The normativity claim of Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

3. Bertea, Stefano. 2023. Where Objective Facts and Norms Meet (and What this Means for Law). International Journal for Semiotics and Law 36: 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09906-5.

4. Bobbio, Norberto. 1984. Il futuro de la democrazia. Torino: Nuovo Politecnico.

5. Dreier, Ralf.. 1978. Concepto y función de la Teoría General del Derecho, trad. Gregorio Robles, Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Complutense 52: 111–138.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3