Abstract
AbstractAdat is originally an Arabic term meaning “custom” or “habit”, and was introduced by Islamic merchants in Maluku and throughout the Indonesian archipelago from the 1200s onward. The term was used as a way to refer to indigenous customs that could not be incorporated into Islamic law. Therefore, rather than referring to a particular system of customs or laws, adat denoted Islamic law’s indeterminate opposite: i.e. the wide variety of indigenous practices which, other than this generalizing label of “custom”, remained undefined. Throughout the chapter, I will trace the development of this term from its original usage to its current-day reinterpretation as a form of diasporic cultural heritage by the Moluccan postcolonial migrant community in the Netherlands. As will become clear, the contemporary Moluccan application can be understood as a strategic reappropriation of the term for the construction of their collective identity, which leaves intact the term’s original capacity of having no fixed definition. By placing the Moluccan application of adat within the historical context of their separatist ideology vis-à-vis Indonesia, and their migration to the Netherlands in the early 1950s, I will argue that their reappropriation of adat as a deliberately indefinable form of Moluccan cultural heritage can be understood as a way for them to protect their collective identity as a separatist people from becoming a matter of wider contestation.
Funder
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Language and Linguistics
Reference24 articles.
1. Bartels, Dieter. 1986. Can the train ever be stopped again? Developments in the Moluccan community in the Netherlands before and after the hijackings. Indonesia 41: 23–45.
2. Benda-Beckmann, Franz and Keebet von. 2011. Myths and stereotypes about adat law: A reassessment of Van Vollenhoven in the light of current struggles over adat law in Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 167/2-3: 167–195.
3. Bos, Andrea van den, Robbert Maruanaija, Ambar Surastri (dir.). Untuk Selalu. Cinemasia Filmlab, 2015. Web.
4. Bourchier, David. 2007. The romance of adat in the Indonesian political imagination and the current revival. In The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The deployment of adat from colonialism to indigenism (eds. Jamie S. Davidson and David Henley). London and New York: Routledge, 113–129.
5. Bowen, J.R. 2003. Public reasoning across cultural pluralism. In Islam, Law and Equality in Indonesia: an anthropology of public reasoning. Cambridge University Press, 253–268.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献