Abstract
AbstractThe article explores the comprehensibility of court forms by providing a quantitative overview and a qualitative analysis of such syntactic characteristics as length and structure of sentences and noun phrases. The analysis is viewed in the broader context of genre characteristics of court forms, their role within legal proceedings, and their function for eliciting narratives from court users. The findings show that while the elicitation strategies are not always coherently aligned with the guidance sections, the guidance itself condenses legal and procedural information into overly complex and verbose syntactic constructions. Comprehensibility barriers are thus created through breaks in information flow, ambiguous syntactic constructions, missing information and misalignment between questions and guidance. Such comprehension challenges have a negative impact on the potential of court users to effectively engage with legal proceedings.
Funder
arts and humanities research council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Language and Linguistics
Reference56 articles.
1. Adler, Mark. 2012. The Plain Language Movement. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, ed. Peter M. Tiersma and Lawrence M. Solan, 67–86. Oxford: OUP.
2. Assy, Rabeea. 2011. Can the law speak directly to its subjects? The limitation of plain language. Journal of Law and Society 38 (3): 376–404.
3. Azuelos-Atias, Sol. 2011. On the incoherence of legal language to the general public. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 24 (1): 41–59.
4. Barocas, Briana, Danielle Emery, and Linda G. Mills. 2016. Changing the domestic violence narrative: Aligning definitions and standards. Journal of family violence 31 (8): 941–947.
5. Bennett, Robert W. 2012. Constitutional Interpretation. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, ed. Peter M. Tiersma and Lawrence M. Solan, 114–127. Oxford: OUP.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献