Abstract
AbstractSince Opuz v. Turkey (2009), the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered over a dozen judgments in which it examined domestic violence through the prism of gender-based discrimination. Apart from the individual circumstances of the cases, the Court considered the general approach to domestic violence in the defendant states, searching for a large-scale structural gender bias. Hence, although the Court has not directly referred to the notion of “structural discrimination” in relation to domestic violence, it engaged in unveiling this problem within the state parties. Building on the case law of the Court, the article presents and systemizes information that may prove structural gender discrimination in domestic violence cases. It navigates potential applicants through the Court’s interpretation and indicates arguments and sources that may support their claims. In particular, it discusses what kind of data and information may demonstrate the general, discriminatory attitude of the authorities towards domestic violence and what sources the applicants may use while seeking the evidence.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Opuz v. Turkey. 2009. Application no. 33401/02 (ECHR 9 June 2009).
2. Rubio-Marín, Ruth, Mathias Möschel. 2015. Anti-Discrimination Exceptionalism: Racist Violence before the ECtHR and the Holocaust Prism. European Journal of International Law, 26/4.
3. D. H. and Others v. the Czech Republic. 2007. Application no. 57325/00 (ECHR 13 November 2007).
4. Fact Sheet – Domestic Violence, European Court of Human Rights. 2023. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/FS_Domestic_violence_ENG. Accessed 20 Dec 2023.
5. Henn, Elisabeth Veronika. 2019. International Human Rights Law and Structural Discrimination: The Example of Violence against Women. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.