“Can I Have a Look?”: The Discursive Management of Victims’ Personal Space During Police First Response Call-Outs to Domestic Abuse Incidents

Author:

Steel KateORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe complexities of domestic abuse as both a lived experience and a crime generate unique communicative challenges at the scene of emergency police call-outs. Space is a prominent and complex feature of these ecounters, entailing a juxtaposition of the institutional and the private, whereby frontline officers seek evidence of abuse from victims in the same space in which the abuse occurred. This paper explores how speakers manage one evidentially salient aspect of these encounters: officers’ advancement into victim’s immediate personal space to inspect and photograph their injuries. As compared with the attention dedicated to preserving vulnerable victims’ personal ‘bubble’ of space in formal investigative interviews, first response guidelines allow participants more leeway to adapt their behaviour according to the unpredictable demands of each situation. I present two case studies here which form part of a wider study of first response call-outs to domestic abuse incidents reported to a UK police force. The audio data have been extracted from police body-worn video footage and transcribed, with visual information represented intralinearly. Through conversation analysis, I examine the microinteractional means by which personal space is made relevant and consequential to the unfolding talk, with a focus on how ownership rights and control over the space are (re)constructed discursively. Analysis demonstrates that entering victims’ personal space can be managed in ways that either reinforce their disempowered position or afford them some control. The findings have implications in relation to victims’ potential vulnerability, police-victim relations and the nature of the evidence produced.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Language and Linguistics

Reference107 articles.

1. Agar, Michael. 1985. Institutional discourse. Text 5(3): 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1985.5.3.147.

2. Aldridge, Jo. 2021. Not an either/or situation”: the minimization of violence against women in united kingdom “Domestic Abuse. Policy. Violence Against Women 27(11): 1823–1839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220927079.

3. Aldridge, Michelle, and June Luchjenbroers. 2008. vulnerable witnesses and problems of portrayal: a consideration of videotaped police interviews in child rape cases. Journal of English Linguistics 36(3): 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424208321205.

4. Aldridge-Waddon, Michelle. 2021. Vulnerable witnesses in police investigative interviews in England and Wales. In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, 2nd ed., ed. Malcolm Coulthard, Alison May, and Rui Sousa-Silva, 281–296. Abingdon: Routledge.

5. Aldridge, Michelle, and Kate Steel. 2022. The role of metaphor in police first response call-outs in cases of suspected domestic abuse. In Metaphor in legal discourse, ed. Irene Šeškauskienė, 224–241. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3