Sisyphus and the Present: Time in Modern and Digital Legalities

Author:

Tranter KieranORCID

Abstract

AbstractAlbert Camus’ reflection in The Myth of Sisyphus presents the absurd, the intrusion of the meaningless and irrational universe into the order and future focus of modern life. Central to Camus’ reading of Sisyphus and his dammed eternal labour, was time. Camus clearly saw that modernity and modern life was predicated on tensions in time. Moderns perceived, and lived, in the timescale of past-present-future. A commitment to chronology that promised an allusion of meaning within a world of essential meaninglessness. Modern law, the law forged by the structural violence of positivism and sovereignty, shared this commitment to time. However, transitions to the digital are presenting different relationships of law and time. Emergent digital legality manifests a Sisyphean closed loop of repeat, return and enclosure, past and future become a blurred undistinguished present. The modern terror of mundane life that Camus tried to recast, seems intensified and totalised in the digital. However, rather than the possibility of the joy of the absurd, there is something else. Sisyphus, Camus imaged, had weathered to look like his rock, but he never merges with it. But in the unfolding of the digital and its legality, the secure subjectivity that Camus exalted is less then certain. This might not be bad.

Funder

Queensland University of Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Language and Linguistics

Reference58 articles.

1. Allen, Layman E, and Caldwell Mary Ellen. 1963. Modern Logic and Judicial Decision Making: A Sketch of One View. Law and Contempory Problems 28: 213–270.

2. Banasiński, Cezary, Marcin Rojszczak. 2021. Cybersecurity of Consumer Products against the Background of the EU Model of Cyberspace Protection. Journal of Cybersecurity 7: tyab011.

3. Barraclough, Tom, and Hamish Fraser, Curtis Barnes. 2021. Legislation as Code for New Zealand: Opportunities, Risks and Recommendations. New Zealand Law Foundation Inofrmation Law and Policy Project;.

4. Black, C. F. 2011. The Land is the Source of the Law: A Dialogic Encounter with Indigenous Jurisprudence. Abingdon: Routledge.

5. Bourne, Craig. 2006. A Future for Presentism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3