Vulnerability, Disability, and Agency: Exploring Structures for Inclusive Decision-Making and Participation in a Responsive State

Author:

Mustaniemi-Laakso MaijaORCID,Katsui HisayoORCID,Heikkilä MikaelaORCID

Abstract

AbstractBy unpacking some of the dichotomies inherent in the concepts of vulnerability and disability, the article problematises some of the current legal approaches to disability in Finland. It argues that where used to single out population groups or individuals due to their embodied characteristics, the vulnerability paradigm can be seen to create binaries both among the persons with disabilities, and between the “vulnerable” persons with disabilities and the perception of a rational, self-standing and autonomous human being. To mitigate such binaries, the article explores an agency-centred discourse of vulnerability, one that recognises the co-existence of agency and vulnerability and sees agency as dynamic and responsive to the societal support structures that surround all of us. One of the central arguments of the article is that generalised approaches do, however, not suffice to make agency a reality for all persons with disabilities. Given the extensive diversity of intra-group variations between persons with disabilities, individualised solutions are needed for agency to be possible for all. To overcome objectification and de-agencification – and to enhance agency – this diversity of situations, needs and contexts of lived-in realities of individuals also needs to be expressly reflected in the legal language in addressing disability.

Funder

Academy of Finland

Abo Akademi University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Language and Linguistics

Reference128 articles.

1. European Committee of Social Rights, International Association Autism-Europe v. France, Collective Complaint No. 13/2002, 4 November 2003.

2. UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 13 December 2006, UN Doc. A/RES/61/106, Annex I.

3. Engström, Viljam, Mikaela Heikkilä, and Maija Mustaniemi-Laakso. 2022. Vulnerabilisation: Between mainstreaming and human rights overreach. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519221092599.

4. Tazzioli, Martina. 2020. The making of migration: The biopolitics of mobility at Europe’s borders. London: Sage publications.

5. Howden, Daniel, and Metin Kodalak. 2018. The Vulnerability contest. The New Humanitarian, October 17. https://deeply.thenewhumanitarian.org/refugees/articles/2018/10/17/the-vulnerability-contest. Accessed 25 October 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3