Abstract
AbstractBy unpacking some of the dichotomies inherent in the concepts of vulnerability and disability, the article problematises some of the current legal approaches to disability in Finland. It argues that where used to single out population groups or individuals due to their embodied characteristics, the vulnerability paradigm can be seen to create binaries both among the persons with disabilities, and between the “vulnerable” persons with disabilities and the perception of a rational, self-standing and autonomous human being. To mitigate such binaries, the article explores an agency-centred discourse of vulnerability, one that recognises the co-existence of agency and vulnerability and sees agency as dynamic and responsive to the societal support structures that surround all of us. One of the central arguments of the article is that generalised approaches do, however, not suffice to make agency a reality for all persons with disabilities. Given the extensive diversity of intra-group variations between persons with disabilities, individualised solutions are needed for agency to be possible for all. To overcome objectification and de-agencification – and to enhance agency – this diversity of situations, needs and contexts of lived-in realities of individuals also needs to be expressly reflected in the legal language in addressing disability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Language and Linguistics
Reference128 articles.
1. European Committee of Social Rights, International Association Autism-Europe v. France, Collective Complaint No. 13/2002, 4 November 2003.
2. UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 13 December 2006, UN Doc. A/RES/61/106, Annex I.
3. Engström, Viljam, Mikaela Heikkilä, and Maija Mustaniemi-Laakso. 2022. Vulnerabilisation: Between mainstreaming and human rights overreach. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519221092599.
4. Tazzioli, Martina. 2020. The making of migration: The biopolitics of mobility at Europe’s borders. London: Sage publications.
5. Howden, Daniel, and Metin Kodalak. 2018. The Vulnerability contest. The New Humanitarian, October 17. https://deeply.thenewhumanitarian.org/refugees/articles/2018/10/17/the-vulnerability-contest. Accessed 25 October 2022.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献