A Perspective of Objectivity in International Human Rights Treaties-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Perspective of Objectivity in International Human Rights Treaties

Published:2020-03-19 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0952-8059
Container-title:International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
language:en
Short-container-title:Int J Semiot Law

Author:

Wu Jingjing

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Language and Linguistics

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11196-020-09695-9.pdf

Reference41 articles.

1. Alexy, R. 1999. A Defense of Radbruch’s Formula. In Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order, ed. David Dyzenhaus. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

2. Bix, B.H. 2006. Robert Alexy. Radbruch’s Formula, and the Nature of Legal Theory, Rechtstheorie 37: 139–149. Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper 06-13.

3. Bix, B.H. 2011. Radbruch’s Formula and Conceptual Analysis. American Jurisprudence 56: 45–57.

4. Committee Against Torture, 4 May 1990, Fourth session, Summary Record of the 51st Meeting, CAT/C/SR.51.

5. Committee Against Torture, 20 July 1993, CAT/C/SR.145/Add.2.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Worst or the Best Treaty? Analysing the Equitable and Reasonable Utilization Principle in the Legal Arrangements of the Helmand River;Asian Journal of International Law;2023-09-14

2. CHINA’S HUMAN RIGHTS DIPLOMACY AND THE UYGHUR CRACKDOWN: THE APPEARANCE OF CONSISTENCY AND THE REALITY OF CONTRADICTION. CHINA’S DOUBLE STANDARDS IN HUMAN RIGHTS;Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences;2022