Abstract
Abstract
Objective
We described source and phosphorus (P) retention potential of soft, fine-grained, streambed sediment and associated phosphorus (sed-P) during summer low-flow conditions. Combining in-channel, sed-P storage with relative age provided context on relevance to western Lake Erie Basin management goals.
Methods
In 2019, rapid geomorphic assessment (30 reaches) compared streambed-sediment storage (S) to streambank erosion (E), providing annual sediment budgets (S:E). Streambed sediment (13 reaches) was fingerprinted and analyzed for sed-P. The P saturation ratio (PSR; four reaches) quantified potential sorption/desorption of dissolved P (DP) between the water column and streambed sediment. Analyses were supplemented with data from 2017 and 2021. The ratio of two fallout radionuclides, beryllium-7 (54-day half-life) and excess lead-210 (22.3 years), apportioned “new” sediment based on time since rainfall contact.
Results
Streambed sediment was mostly streambank (54–96%) for contributing areas > 2.7 km2; for upstream reaches, a larger percentage was apportioned as upland (cropland, pasture, forest, and road), with < 30% streambank. Streambank erosion correlated with contributing area; however, soil type (ecoregion), stream characteristics, and land use combined to drive streambed-sediment storage. Individual-reach S:E (accumulation of 0.01–35 years of streambank erosion) differentiated erosional and depositional in-channel environments. Most reaches indicated that 17–57% of sediment had recent contact with rainfall. Streambed-sediment PSR indicated a low potential for further sorption of DP from the water column; one reach was a P source when sampled.
Conclusion
Sed-P was higher in streambed sediment than in source samples, which varied by land use and ecoregion. This indicates homogenization resulting from in-stream sorption of DP during sediment transport that occurs over multiple events.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference86 articles.
1. Annex 4 Task Team (2015) Recommended phosphorus loading targets for Lake Erie - Annex 4 Objectives and Targets Task Team Final Report to the Nutrients Annex Subcommittee, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/report-recommended-phosphorus-loading-targets-lake-erie-201505.pdf
2. Baker DB, Confesor R, Ewing DE, Johnson LT, Kramer JW, Merryfield BJ (2014) Phosphorus loading to Lake Erie from the Maumee, Sandusky and Cuyahoga rivers: the importance of bioavailability. J Great Lakes Res 40:502–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2014.05.001
3. Baker DB, Johnson LT, Confesor RB, Crumrine JP, Guo T, Manning NF (2019) Needed: early-term adjustments for Lake Erie phosphorus target loads to address western basin cyanobacterial blooms. J Great Lakes Res 45:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2019.01.011
4. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. Series B (Methodological) 57:289–300. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101
5. Blount JD, Lenoch LEK, Fitzpatrick FA (2022) Stream corridor and upland sources of fluvial sediment and phosphorus from a mixed urban-agricultural tributary to the Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 48:1536–1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2022.08.024