Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The effect of thin-layer capping with activated biochar on sediment-to-water flux was investigated. For the first time, the diffusion of both polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and arsenic (As) were studied simultaneously. The fate of As was investigated, under successive dysoxic and oxic conditions, in order to assess and discuss potential trade-off effects when using biochar as an active sorbent for capping of multi-contaminated sediments.
Methods
Sediments from the Bureå bay (Sweden), contaminated with PAH and metal elements including As and Hg, were capped with activated biochar and/or bentonite in simple microcosm test systems in the laboratory. The contaminant transport from sediment through the capping to water body was studied by sampling metals in the water phase above the cap over time, or PAH in a heptane layer over water, at regular time intervals.
Results
Consistently with the limited previous studies, reductions were observed (e.g., 60–65% for 15-PAH, 100% for chrysene) in sediment-to-water PAH fluxes upon biochar-based thin-layer capping. However, the most important novel finding revealed ambiguous effects of biochar capping on redox-sensitive elements, in particular As. Under the microcosm conditions of the experiment, where pH was affected by the capping material, biochar treatments favoured As mobility under oxic conditions, directly and/or via effects on Fe speciation. While capping limited the diffusion of As under dysoxic conditions, this also favoured greater As mobility under oxic water conditions compared to no capping.
Conclusion
Design and monitoring of capping of PAH contaminated sediments should account for potential negative effects on co-occurring contaminants.
Funder
Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning
Norges Forskningsråd
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Stratigraphy,Earth-Surface Processes
Reference51 articles.
1. Amstaetter K, Eek E, Cornelissen G (2012) Sorption of PAHs and PCBs to activated carbon: coal versus biomass-based quality. Chemosphere 87:573–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.007
2. Azcue JM, Zeman AJ, Förstner U (1998) International review of application of subaqueous capping techniques for remediation of contaminated sediments. In: Seco e Pinto PS (ed) Environmental Geotechnics. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 537–542
3. Bessinger BA, Vlassopoulos D, Serrano S, O’Day PA (2012) Reactive transport modeling of subaqueous sediment caps and implications for the long-term fate of arsenic, mercury, and methylmercury. Aquat Geochem 18(4):297–326
4. Bianco F, Race M, Papirio S, Oleszczuk P, Esposito G (2021) The addition of biochar as a sustainable strategy for the remediation of PAH–contaminated sediments. Chemosphere 263:128274
5. Boudreau BP (1997) Diagenetic models and their implementation. Springer, Berlin, p 414