View selection in multi-view stacking: choosing the meta-learner

Author:

van Loon WouterORCID,Fokkema MarjoleinORCID,Szabo BotondORCID,de Rooij MarkORCID

Abstract

AbstractMulti-view stacking is a framework for combining information from different views (i.e. different feature sets) describing the same set of objects. In this framework, a base-learner algorithm is trained on each view separately, and their predictions are then combined by a meta-learner algorithm. In a previous study, stacked penalized logistic regression, a special case of multi-view stacking, has been shown to be useful in identifying which views are most important for prediction. In this article we expand this research by considering seven different algorithms to use as the meta-learner, and evaluating their view selection and classification performance in simulations and two applications on real gene-expression data sets. Our results suggest that if both view selection and classification accuracy are important to the research at hand, then the nonnegative lasso, nonnegative adaptive lasso and nonnegative elastic net are suitable meta-learners. Exactly which among these three is to be preferred depends on the research context. The remaining four meta-learners, namely nonnegative ridge regression, nonnegative forward selection, stability selection and the interpolating predictor, show little advantages in order to be preferred over the other three.

Funder

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Universiteit Leiden

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference54 articles.

1. Anagnostopoulos C, Hand DJ (2019) . hmeasure: the H-measure and other scalar classification performance metrics https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hmeasure R package version 1.0-2

2. Ballings M, Van den Poel D (2013) AUC: threshold independent performance measures for probabilistic classifiers. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AUC R package version 0.3.0

3. Benner A, Zucknick M, Hielscher T, Ittrich C, Mansmann U (2010) High-dimensional cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process. Biom J 52(1):50–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200900064

4. Bommert A, Sun X, Bischl B, Rahnenführer J, Lang M (2020) Benchmark for filter methods for feature selection in high-dimensional classification data. Comput Stat Data Anal 14(3):106–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2019.106839

5. Breiman L (1996) Stacked regressions. Mach Learn 24:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00117832

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3