Umbrella strategy with systemic and intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter, randomized Phase III clinical trial

Author:

Yang YangORCID,Wei JiaORCID,Du Juan,Zou Zhengyun,Wei Rongfu,Zhang Fenglin,Shen Weisheng,Lu Xiyan,Sun Sanyuan,Li Xiaoqin,Nie Chunlan,Chen Gang,Yu Lixia,Qian Hanqing,Yang Yan,Liu Qin,Shen Jie,Wang Lifeng,Xing Yajun,Cui Fangbo,Shi Jianmin,Xi Lei,Deng Lichun,Cao Xiangmin,Zhu Qing,Yuan Yuan,Cheng Meilian,Xu Hui,Yuan Ling,Guo Miaomiao,Wang Meng,Gao Changyan,Qian Xiaoping,Guan WenxianORCID,Liu BaoruiORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background We have developed a tridirectional regimen combining intraperitoneal, intravenous, and oral chemotherapy as a treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer and individualized these chemotherapeutics according to mRNA expression. This multicenter Phase III umbrella study compared the efficacy and safety of individualized tridirectional intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy with that of standard systemic chemotherapy. Methods BRCA1/TOPO1 mRNA expression was examined in all enrolled patients. The patients were then randomized in a ratio of 3:1 to an individualized arm and a control arm. Patients in the control arm received systemic intravenous/oral chemotherapy, whereas those in the individualized arm received sensitive chemotherapeutics selected from oxaliplatin/cisplatin/docetaxel/irinotecan/S-1 according to their BRCA1/TOPO1 mRNA expression and received individualized tridirectional intraperitoneal/intravenous/oral chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and the secondary endpoints were response rate, overall survival, and safety. Results Overall, 233 of 240 patients enrolled between August 2014 and December 2016 were included in the efficacy analysis. Baseline patient characteristics were balanced between the two arms. The objective response rate was 33.9% in the control arm and 49.1% in the individualized arm (P = 0.039). In the control and individualized arms, median progression-free survival was 5.9 months and 8.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio 0.521, 95% confidence interval 0.362–0.750, P = 0.0005) and median overall survival was 13.5 months and 16.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio 0.684, 95% confidence interval 0.474–0.988, P = 0.0430). Both regimens were tolerable. Conclusion The primary analysis demonstrated the statistical superiority of this tridirectional individualized regimen and suggests that this regimen has clinical efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (chictr.org.cn) Identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-15006201.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3