Review on Methods for Assessing and Predicting Leaching of PFAS from Solid Matrices

Author:

Navarro Divina A.,Kabiri Shervin S.,Bowles Karl,Knight Emma R.,Braeunig Jennifer,Srivastava Prashant,Boxall Naomi J.,Douglas Grant,Mueller Jochen,McLaughlin Mike J.,Williams Mike,Kookana Rai S.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are prevalent environmental contaminants detected in materials such as soils, biosolids, and wastes. Understanding PFAS leaching is crucial for assessing risks associated with leaving impacted material in place, reuse, or disposal. However, there is limited guidance on laboratory methods to measure extent and rate of leaching. This review aims to identify the best methods for assessing PFAS leaching that are reflective of relevant release scenarios. Recent Findings Various methods have been applied to assess PFAS leaching from contaminated materials. The most common are batch leaching methods that simulate particular conditions (e.g. rainfall, landfill), with the intention of providing conservative estimates (worst-case scenarios) of cumulative PFAS release over time. Columns, static leaching, and rainfall simulators are also used to simulate less aggressive field-like conditions. While less common, pan and suction lysimeters have been used to measure PFAS leaching in situ. Most methods use saturated conditions that do not account for the possible influence of air–water interface accumulation and wetting–drying cycles on leaching. A notable gap is the scarcity of data benchmarking laboratory-leached concentrations with real-world PFAS concentrations. Establishing this relationship is crucial for reliable laboratory protocols. Summary This article reviews methods for estimating leaching of PFAS from contaminated materials. Given the variety of methods, selecting those that best simulate assessment objectives is essential. Specific scenarios requiring PFAS leaching assessment, such as leaving materials in place, reuse, and disposal, are discussed. The knowledge gaps presented could be used to improve existing leaching methods for better predictions and understanding of PFAS leachability. Graphical Abstract

Funder

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference83 articles.

1. Ding G, Peijnenburg W. Physicochemical properties and aquatic toxicity of poly- and perfluorinated compounds. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2013;43:598–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2011.627016.

2. Krafft MP, Riess JG. Per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFASs): environmental challenges. Curr Opin Coll In. 2015;20(3):192–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2015.07.004.

3. HEPA. Australia and New Zealand EPA. PFAS National Environmental Management Plan version 2.0, Heads of EPA Australia and New Zealand 2020.

4. United States Environmental Protection Agency. US EPA, Method 1311. Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure. EPA SW-846: test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.; 1992.

5. Australian Standards. AS4439.3;2019, Wastes, sediments and contaminated soils. Part 3. Preparation of leachates - bottle leaching procedure. Sydney, NSW, Australia.: Standards Australia; 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3