Author:
Li Shaochi,Liu Yan,Zhou Guangquan,Zhang Wenjuan,Wei Shengmei,He Jiajia,Stephen Liao Shaoyi,Wei Hang
Abstract
Abstract
Background and objective
Clinical studies indicated that femoral head collapse (FHC) occurs in 90% of patients without intervention within five years after the diagnosis of femoral head necrosis (FHN). The management of the FHN is still a great challenging task. Clinical studies indicated that hip abduction as physical therapy represents an effective hip preservation method. However, the mechanism is unclear. In this study, we use computational biomechanical technology to investigate mechanical response in FHN patients with hip abduction and establish guide protocols for FHN rehabilitation.
Materials and methods
Thirty computational models were constructed for evaluating the safety of hip abduction and comparing the biomechanical performance of hip abduction for the treatment of different necrotic classifications. The distribution of principal compressive stress (PCS) and load share ratio (LSR) were computed and used for biomechanical evaluation.
Results
Before the start of physical therapy, when the size of necrotic segment is increased and located more laterally, the damage area of PCS enlarged and LSR of subchondral cortical to trabecular bone increased. As the increase of hip abduction angle, PCS of Type B transformed into Type A, PCS of Type C1 transformed into Type B, PCS of Type C2 transformed into Type C1; Except Type C2, the LSR return to normal level.
Discussion and conclusion
Stress transfer damaged pattern correlated significantly with necrotic classification. Hip abduction motions effectively enlarge the area of PCS and recover the LSR of different structures by altering motion posture during gait. The results indicated that hip abduction may be an effective physical therapy in improving hip function and interrupt the disease pathway of FHC and THA.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Matej D, Srecko H, Drage D, et al. Contact stress in hips with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:92–9.
2. Lai YS, Wei HW, Cheng CK. An analysis of hip replacement data of Taiwan. Read at the northern region congress of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association in conjunction with the Third Annual Meeting of the Pacific Asian Society of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. 2003; 5–6; Taipei, Taiwan.
3. Neumayr LD, Aquilar C, Earles AN, et al. Physical therapy alone compared with core decompression and physical therapy for femoral head osteonecrosis in sickle cell disease. Results of a multicenter study at a mean of three years after treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(12):2573–82.
4. Bose VC, Baruah BD. Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a minimum follow-up of four years. J Bone Jt Surg. 2010;92-B:922–8.
5. Hasegawa Y, Iwata H, Torii S, et al. Vascularized pedicle bone-grafting for nontraumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a 5-to 11-year follow up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116:251–8.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献