Abstract
AbstractIn pharmaceutical manufacturing, ensuring product safety involves the detection and identification of microorganisms with human pathogenic potential, including Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC), Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium sporogenes, Candida albicans, and Mycoplasma spp., some of which may be missed or not identified by traditional culture-dependent methods. In this study, we employed a metagenomic approach to detect these taxa, avoiding the limitations of conventional cultivation methods. We assessed the groundwater microbiome’s taxonomic and functional features from samples collected at two locations in the spring and summer. All datasets comprised 436–557 genera with Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Cyanobacteria accounting for > 95% of microbial DNA sequences. The aforementioned species constituted less than 18.3% of relative abundance. Escherichia and Salmonella were mainly detected in Hot Springs, relative to Jefferson, while Clostridium and Pseudomonas were mainly found in Jefferson relative to Hot Springs. Multidrug resistance efflux pumps and BlaR1 family regulatory sensor-transducer disambiguation dominated in Hot Springs and in Jefferson. These initial results provide insight into the detection of specified microorganisms and could constitute a framework for the establishment of comprehensive metagenomic analysis for the microbiological evaluation of pharmaceutical-grade water and other non-sterile pharmaceutical products, ensuring public safety.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Halls N (2004) Effects and causes of contamination in sterile manufacturing. CRC Press, Boca Raton
2. Jimenez L (2019) Analysis of FDA Enforcement Reports (2012–2019) to determine the microbial diversity in contaminated non-sterile and sterile drugs. Am Pharm Rev. https://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/Featured-Articles/518912-Analysis-of-FDA-Enforcement-Reports-2012-2019-to-Determine-the-Microbial-Diversity-in-Contaminated-Non-Sterile-and-Sterile-Drugs/. Accessed 2 Aug 2023
3. USP<1111> (2016) Microbiological examination of non-sterile products: acceptance criteria for pharmaceutical preparations and substances for pharmaceutical use. https://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp/document/harmonization/gen-method/q05c_pf_ira_33_2_2007.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2023
4. USP<60> (2018) Microbiological examination of nonsterile products - tests for Burkholderia cepacia complex. http://www.usppf.com/pf/pub/data/v445/CHA_IPR_445_c60.xml. Accessed 2 Aug 2023
5. USP<61> (2016) Microbiological examination of nonsterile products - microbial enumeration tests. https://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp/document/harmonization/gen-method/q05b_pf_ira_34_6_2008.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2023