Moral conflict in agriculture: Conquest or moral coevolution?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Moral conflict in agriculture: Conquest or moral coevolution?

Published:1984-09 Issue:4 Volume:1 Page:17-25
ISSN:0889-048X
Container-title:Agriculture and Human Values
language:en
Short-container-title:Agric Hum Values

Author:

Shepard Philip T.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01535975/fulltext.html

Reference27 articles.

1. Asquith, P. and S. Spees. 1984.Metaphor in Science: Assessing a Particular Aspect of Constructivist Explanation. Proposal to the Humanities, Science and Technology Program, National Endowment for the Humanities.

2. Benjamin, M. and J. Curtis. 1981.Ethics in Nursing. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 180 pp.

3. Dickson, D. 1974.The Politics of Alternative Technology. Universe Books, New York. 224 pp.

4. Dumont, L. 1980.Homo Hierarchicus. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 488 pp.

5. Fay, B. 1975.Social Theory and Political Practice. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London. 123 pp.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Value-laden knowledge and holistic thinking in agricultural research;Agriculture and Human Values;1992-06

2. Ethics, ecology and development: Styles of ethics and styles of agriculture;Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics;1992-03

3. Impartiality and Interpretive Intervention in Technical Controversy;Technological Transformation;1989

4. Resolving normative differences or healing a “two-cultures” split? A discussion of R.D. Hollander's “values and making decisions about agricultural research”;Agriculture and Human Values;1988-09

5. Ethical dilemmas in agriculture: The need for recognition and resolution;Agriculture and Human Values;1988-09