Abstract
AbstractNudging, according to its inventors and defenders, is supposed to provide a non-coercive way of changing human behavior for the better—a freedom-respecting form of “libertarian paternalism.” Its original point was to complement coercive modes of influence without any need of justification in liberal frameworks. This article shows, using the example of food-product placement in grocery stores, how this image is deceptive. Although nudging practices may not restrict the freedom of consumers, nudging arrangements by public health authorities do restrict the freedom of shopkeepers in standard liberal senses. Libertarianism cannot justify this coercion, and the creed is best left out of the equation as the ideological ruse that it, in this discussion, is. Other liberal theories can justify the coercion, but on grounds that can also be applied to other methods of public health promotion by subsidies and regulation. This result reaffirms that nudging should be seen to complement, not to replace, those other methods.
Funder
Maa- ja MetsätalousministeriÖ
Aalto University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science
Reference94 articles.
1. Ahola-Launonen, J. 2018. Hijacking Responsibility: Philosophical Studies on Health Distribution. Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences 92, University of Helsinki, Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-3340-3
2. Ahola-Launonen, J., Takala, T., & Häyry, M. 2019. Dogmas, stigmas, and questionable arguments for better health. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 28(2), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180119000045.
3. Anderson, E.S. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109(2), 287–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/233897.
4. Barauskaite, G., & Streimikiene, D. 2021. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2048.
5. Beauchamp, T.L., & Childress, J. F. 2019 [1979]. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Eight edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.