Conspiracy Theories

Author:

Cassam Quassim

Abstract

AbstractCurrent thinking about conspiracy theories is dominated by epistemological and psychological approaches. The former see the study of conspiracy theories as a branch of epistemology and insist that each theory should be judged on its evidential merits. On this account, a conspiracy theory is an explanation of an event which cites a conspiracy as a salient cause. Psychological approaches explain belief in conspiracy theories by reference to individual personality traits and generic cognitive biases. Despite their popularity, both epistemological and psychological approaches are flawed. After identifying their flaws, a case is made for a different perspective which focuses on the political function of conspiracy theories. A conspiracy theory is not just an explanation of an event which cites a conspiracy as a salient cause. Conspiracy theories have a range of additional features which distinguish them from ordinary theories about conspiracies and make them unlikely to be true. The political approach sees many conspiracy theories as forms of political propaganda and is especially mindful of the role of conspiracy theories in promoting extremist ideologies.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science

Reference33 articles.

1. Allen, M. 2020. ‘Immune to Evidence’: How Dangerous Coronavirus Conspiracy Theories Spread, ProPublica 17 May 2020 (https://www.propublica.org/article/immune-to-evidence-how-dangerous-coronavirus-conspiracies-spread). Accessed 17 Aug 2021

2. Bloom, M. & Moskalenko, S. 2021. Pastels and Pedophiles: Inside the Mind of QAnon. Stanford: Redwood Press.

3. Brennan, J. 2017. Propaganda about Propaganda. Critical Review, 29, 34-48.

4. Brotherton, R. 2015. Suspicious Minds: Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories. London: Bloomsbury Sigma.

5. Byford, J. 2011. Conspiracy Theories: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3