Abstract
AbstractPolitical philosophy is having a methodological moment. Driven by long-standing frustrations at the fragmentation of our field, as well as recent urges to become more engaged with the ‘real’ world, there is now a boom in debates concerning the ‘true’ nature of our vocation. Yet how can this new work avoid simply recycling old rivalries under new labels? The key is to turn all this so-called methodological interest into a genuinely new programme of ‘methodology’, defined here as the careful identification and evaluation of all the different methods of reasoning available to us as political philosophers. This programme would clarify, for the first time, all the many ways in which we might argue with one another, thus making us less likely to talk past each another, and more likely to work fruitfully together.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science
Reference50 articles.
1. Appiah, K.A. 2008. Experiments in Ethics. Harvard University Press.
2. Berlin, I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press.
3. Blau, A. 2017. Methods in Analytical Political Theory. Cambridge University Press.
4. Bourke, R., & Geuss, R. 2009. Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn. Cambridge University Press.
5. Cohen, G.A. 2009. Why Not Socialism?. Princeton University Press.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献