Abstract
AbstractThere are numerous conceptions of violence today, such as physical, psychological, emotional, structural, and epistemic. The question of which social phenomena are to be described as violence is itself a matter of furious dispute. In social theory, there is a widespread tendency to distinguish between ‘modern’ and ‘postmodern’ conceptions of violence. In this scheme, modern violence is primarily physical, while postmodern violence takes places across a broad spectrum of forms. The paper questions this binary. The co-occurrence and conflict between these forms of violence leads to a third form, which I call refigured violence. The refiguration of violence can be observed in three developments, which are mediatisation, polycontexturalisation, and translocalisation. I provide one illustration of these considerations with the example of so-called shock sites on the internet. In so doing, I emphasise that the sociology of knowledge can provide a valuable perspective for making sense of contemporary discourses about violence in all their complexity.
Funder
Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Alvarez, M. 2017. Online spectatorship of death and dying: Pleasure, purpose and community in BestGore.com. Participations, 14(1), 2-21.
2. Astley, M. 2016. Snuff 2.0: Real Death Goes HD Ready. In N. Jackson, S. Kimber, J. Walker & T. J. Watson (Eds.), Snuff. Real Death and Screen Media (pp. 153-170). Bloomsbury.
3. Bauman, Z. 1996. Gewalt – modern und postmodern. In M. Miller & H.-G. Soeffner (Eds.), Modernität und Barbarei. Soziologische Zeitdiagnose am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts (pp. 36-67). Suhrkamp.
4. Bauman, Z. 2000a. Old and new violence. Journal for Conflict and Violence Research, 2(1), 28-42.
5. Bauman, Z. 2000b. Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.