Abstract
Abstract
The current study aims to examine the influence of personality traits (alternative Zuckerman model) and driving anger in the explanation of risky driving style in individuals convicted for road safety offences (N = 245), using as a basis an adaptation of the context-mediated model. This is a transversal, descriptive study designed to be implemented by means of surveys, in which took part 245 men convicted of road safety offences from five prisons in Galicia (a region in northwestern Spain) took part. The average age of the participants was 38.73 years (Sx-9.61), with a range between 18 and 64 years. All participants had three or more years of driving experience. Our data shows that the Impulsive-Sensation Seeking (Imp-SS) personality trait had a direct and positive effect on dangerous driving, while the Activity (Act) trait had a direct but negative effect. The Aggression-Hostility (Agg-Host) trait, in turn, influenced the risky driving style, but not directly, but by raising driving anger levels, so it acted as a powerful mediator between the Aggression-Hostility (Agg-Hos) trait and the risky driving style. In general, our research partially replicates and expands previous findings regarding the model used, the aggression-hostility personality trait (Agg-Host) was placed in the distal context, driving anger in the proximal context, while age and personality traits Activity (Act) and Impulsive-Sensation Seeking (Imp-SS) were direct predictors. The results of this study may have practical implications for the detection and rehabilitation of offenders and penalties for road safety offences.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference96 articles.
1. Aluja, A., Rossier, J., Garcia, L., Angleitner, A., Kuhlman, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2006). A cross-cultural shortened form of the ZKPQ (ZKPQ-50-CC) adapted to English, French, German, and Spanish languages. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.001
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
3. Bartl, G., Assailly, J. P., Chatenet, F., Hatakka, M., Keskinen, E., & Willmes-Lenz, G. (2002). EU-project Andrea: Analysis of Driver Rehabilitation Programmes. Vienna: KuratoriumFur Verkehrssicherheit. Retrieved November 20, 2021, from: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/projects/andrea_final_report.pdf.
4. Begg, D. J., & Angley, J. D. (2004). Identifying predictors of persistent non-alcohol or drug related risky driving behaviours among a cohort of young adults. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 1067–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.03.001
5. Berdoulat, E., Vavassori, D., & Sastre, M. T. M. (2013). Driving anger, emotional and instrumental aggressiveness, and impulsiveness in the prediction of aggressive and transgressive driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 758–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.029
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献