Author:
Vowels Laura M.,Carnelley Katherine B.,Kumashiro Madoka,Rowe Angela C.
Abstract
AbstractRomantic partners often support each other to progress toward goals. However, at times partners’ goals are not in harmony and conflict with partner or relationship needs, leading to negative consequences for couple members. The present study examined whether non-harmonious opportunities were associated with support provider’s and recipient’s behavior, perceived partner support, and goal outcomes. We further examined whether these effects were moderated by attachment styles. Findings from two experimental (n1= 296, n2= 117) and one dyadic daily diary (n3= 267) showed how having non-harmonious goals lead to problematic goal pursuit. Partners are less likely to behave positively toward the support provider, provide partner support, view their partners as supportive, and report less commitment to partners, and make less goal progress when goal non-harmony is present. Importantly, we did not find moderation effects of attachment styles for these processes. The findings highlight the importance of managing goal non-harmony in couples.
Funder
National Science Foundation
University of Southampton
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Arriaga, X. B., Kumashiro, M., Finkel, E. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Luchies, L. B. (2014). Filling the void: Bolstering attachment security in committed relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613509287
2. Bar-Kalifa, E., Pshedetzky-Shochat, R., Rafaeli, E., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2017). Daily support equity in romantic couples. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 790–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617725150
3. Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(2), 147–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590072001
4. Batson, D. C. (1993). Communal and exchange relationships: What is the difference? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 677–683.
5. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In W. S. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press.