Dimensionality and reliability of the online version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in a large Colombian sample: Results from the PSY-COVID study
-
Published:2023-09-28
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1046-1310
-
Container-title:Current Psychology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Curr Psychol
Author:
Sanabria-Mazo Juan P.ORCID, Gómez-Acosta AndrésORCID, Castro-Muñoz John AlexanderORCID, Rojas Yonatan Ferney, Feliu-Soler AlbertORCID, Luciano Juan V.ORCID, Sanz AntoniORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) is an ultra-brief screening instrument to measure depressive and anxiety symptoms. This study evaluated the dimensionality and reliability of the online version of the PHQ-4 in a large sample of the general population in Colombia. Data were collected during the first phase of lockdown measures occasioned by the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 18,061 adult participants completed the online version of the PHQ-4. The characteristics of the items and subscales were explored. Dimensionality was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), including an examination of invariance (configural, metric, and scalar) across socio-demographic characteristics. Reliability indices were computed and known-groups validity was addressed by estimating associations between PHQ-4 scores and socio-demographic characteristics. The CFA showed significantly adequate fit indices for the expected two-factor structure, being invariant across gender, age, income level, education level, and region. Internal consistency was satisfactory for the PHQ-2 (α = .83), the GAD-2 (α = .79), and the PHQ-4 (α = .86). Higher scores on depressive (PHQ-2), anxiety (GAD-2), and psychological distress (PHQ-4) symptoms in females and young people, and those respondents with lower income, unemployed, and lower level of education were observed. The findings indicate that the PHQ-4 is a reliable scale for depressive and anxiety symptoms among adult Colombian people, being recommendable this tool for online surveys.
Funder
Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology
Reference46 articles.
1. Baxter, A. J., Vos, T., Scott, K. M., Ferrari, A. J., & Whiteford, H. A. (2014). The global burden of anxiety disorders in 2010. Psychological Medicine, 44(11), 2363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713003243 2. Caballero-Domínguez, C. C., Pedrozo-Pupo, J. C., & Campo-Arias, A. (2022). Depression among COVID-19 survivors in Colombia. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 28(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2022.2085879 3. Cano-Vindel, A., Muñoz-Navarro, R., Medrano, L. A., Ruiz-Rodríguez, P., González-Blanch, C., Gómez-Castillo, M. D., Capafons-Bonet, A., Chacón, F., Santolayay, F., & PsicAP Research Group. (2018). A computerized version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 as an ultra-brief screening tool to detect emotional disorders in primary care. Journal of Affective Disorders, 234(247), 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.01.030 4. Campbell, N., Ali, F., Finlay, A. Y., & Salek, S. S. (2015). Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality-of-Life Aspects of Treatment, Care, and Rehabilitation, 24(8), 1949–1961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0937-3 5. Castro-Rodríguez, J. I., Olariu, E., Garnier-Lacueva, C., Martín-López, L. M., Pérez-Solà, V., Alonso, J., Forero, C. G., & INSAyD Investigators. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders: A comparison of primary care and specialized care patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 172, 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.020
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|