Examining the curvilinear relationship between emotional labour and work engagement: evidence from Chinese beginning EFL teachers-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Examining the curvilinear relationship between emotional labour and work engagement: evidence from Chinese beginning EFL teachers

Published:2024-08-12 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1046-1310
Container-title:Current Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Curr Psychol

Author:

Li Hanxi^ORCID

Funder

Ministry of Education China Humanities and Social Science Youth Project A Study on Township Secondary School English Teachers’ Emotional Labour from the perspective of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory

Social Science Research Planning Fund of the Education Department of Jilin Province A Study of the Novice Secondary School English Teachers’ Emotional Labour

Jilin Jianzhu University’s educational research project A study of learner agency in college English teaching

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12144-024-06408-4.pdf

Reference40 articles.

1. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly,36(3), 421–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203

2. Benesch, S., & Prior, M. T. (2023). Rescuing “emotion labor” from (and for) language teacher emotion research. System,113, 102995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.102995

3. Brotheridge, C. L. M., & Lee, R. T. (2002). Testing a conservation of resources model of the dynamics of emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,7(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.7.1.57

4. Burić, I., & Macuka, I. (2018). Self-efficacy, emotions and work engagement among teachers: A two wave cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies,19(7), 1917–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9903-9

5. Cheung, F. Y. L., & Lun, V. M. (2015). Relation between emotional labor and organizational citizenship behavior: An investigation among Chinese teaching professionals. The Journal of General Psychology,142(4), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2015.1091764