Abstract
AbstractThe analysis of the relationships between cognitive reserve and different cognitive domains has become a matter of interest since it can help us detect deviations from the typical ageing process. The main objective of our study was to analyse a structural equation model representing cognitive reserve’s relationships with three cognitive domains (episodic memory, working memory, and sentence comprehension) in older adults with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment patients, in a cross-sectional study. A total of 266 Spanish-speaking older adults, from 65 to 80 years old, voluntarily participated in the study. The assessment protocol includes questionnaires as well as screening and domain-specific tests, providing relevant information for the classification of participants in the two groups previously mentioned (n1 = 150 and n2 = 116). The proposed model presented metric and configural invariance as well as stability across groups, since the indices reflecting goodness-of-fit reach acceptable values. Our hypotheses are partially confirmed since cognitive reserve strongly influences working memory and it does moderately in sentence comprehension in both groups, but it hardly influences episodic memory in the subjective cognitive decline group, while both are inversely associated in the patients’ group. Working memory could be considered as a mechanism through which cognitive reserve exerts its protector role on other cognitive domains: on sentence comprehension in both groups, and on episodic memory in the subjective cognitive decline group. However, in mild cognitive impairments patients, cognitive reserve does no longer influence episodic memory via working memory in a significant manner.
Funder
Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Arenaza-Urquijo, E. M., Wirth, M., & Chételat, G. (2015). Cognitive reserve and lifestyle: Moving towards preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers In Aging Neuroscience, 7, 134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00134.
2. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature reviews neuroscience, 4, 829. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201.
3. Benton, A. L., Hamsher, K., & Sivan, A. B. (1976). Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa: University of Iowa.
4. Bian, H. (2011). Structural Equation Modelling with Amos II. Office for the Faculty of Excellence. https://www.scribd.com/doc/283895591/SEMwith-AMOS-II-pdf. Accessed 26 December 2021
5. Cabeza, R., Albert, M., Belleville, S., Craik, F. I., Duarte, A., Grady, C. L., et al. (2018). Maintenance, reserve and compensation: The cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19, 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0068-2.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献