Random dictatorship for privacy-preserving social choice

Author:

Torra VicençORCID

Abstract

Abstract Social choice provides methods for collective decisions. They include methods for voting and for aggregating rankings. These methods are used in multiagent systems for similar purposes when decisions are to be made by agents. Votes and rankings are sensitive information. Because of that, privacy mechanisms are needed to avoid the disclosure of sensitive information. Cryptographic techniques can be applied in centralized environments to avoid the disclosure of sensitive information. A trusted third party can then compute the outcome. In distributed environments, we can use a secure multiparty computation approach for implementing a collective decision method. Other privacy models exist. Differential privacy and k-anonymity are two of them. They provide privacy guarantees that are complementary to multiparty computation approaches, and solutions that can be combined with the cryptographic ones, thus providing additional privacy guarantees, e.g., a differentially private multiparty computation model. In this paper, we propose the use of probabilistic social choice methods to achieve differential privacy. We use the method called random dictatorship and prove that under some circumstances differential privacy is satisfied and propose a variation that is always compliant with this privacy model. Our approach can be implemented using a centralized approach and also a decentralized approach. We briefly discuss these implementations.

Funder

Vetenskapsrådet

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Information Systems,Software

Reference30 articles.

1. Adida, B., Wikström, D.: How to shuffle in public. Proceedings of TCC 2007. LNCS 4392, pp. 555–574 (2007)

2. Arrow, K.J.: A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J. Political Econ. 58(4), 328–346 (1950)

3. Arrow, K.J., Sen, A., Suzumura, K.: Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Volume 1, Volume 2 (2011). North Holland, Amsterdam (2002)

4. Apple. Apple Differential Privacy Technical Overview. (2017). https://images.apple.com/au/privacy/docs/Differential_Privacy_Overview.pdf . Accessed 14 Oct 2019

5. Barberà, S.: Majority and positional voting in a probabilistic framework. Rev. Econo. Stud. 42(2), 379–389 (1979)

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Blockchain Technology’s Role in an Electronic Voting System for Developing Countries to Produce Better Results;2023 3rd International Conference on Innovative Mechanisms for Industry Applications (ICIMIA);2023-12-21

2. The rise of “security and privacy”: bibliometric analysis of computer privacy research;International Journal of Information Security;2023-10-31

3. Decentralized and Secure Blockchain-Powered Smart Card-Based Cloud Voting System;Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B;2023-04-13

4. Security of Electronic Voting Systems Using Blockchain Technology;Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence;2023

5. Differentially Private Probabilistic Social Choice in the Shuffle Model;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3