Breakthrough analysis of the CO2/CH4 separation on electrospun carbon nanofibers
-
Published:2024-01
Issue:1
Volume:30
Page:107-119
-
ISSN:0929-5607
-
Container-title:Adsorption
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Adsorption
Author:
Selmert VictorORCID, Kretzschmar AnsgarORCID, Kungl HansORCID, Tempel HermannORCID, Eichel Rüdiger-A.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe removal of the main impurity CO2 is a crucial step in biogas upgrading. In this work, the separation of CO2 from CH4 on electrospun polyacrylonitrile-based carbon nanofibers (CNFs) is investigated using breakthrough experiments. The CNFs are prepared at various carbonization temperatures ranging from 600 to 900 °C and feature a tailorable pore size that decreases at higher carbonization temperatures. The adsorption properties of the different CNFs are studied measuring pure component isotherms as well as column breakthrough experiments. Adsorption kinetics are discussed using a linear driving force approach to model the breakthrough experiment and obtain the adsorption rate constant. Moreover, different approaches to determine the selectivity of the competitive CO2/CH4 adsorption are applied and discussed in detail. The results clearly prove that a size exclusion effect governs the adsorption selectivity on the CNFs. While CH4 cannot adsorb in the pores of CNFs prepared at 800 °C or above, the smaller CO2 is only excluded from the pores of CNFs prepared at 900 °C. For CNFs carbonized in the range from 600 to 750 °C, values of the CO2/CH4 selectivity of 11–14 are obtained. On the CNFs prepared at 800 °C the CH4 adsorption is severely hindered, leading to a reduced adsorbed amount of CH4 and consequently to an improved CO2/CH4 selectivity of 40. Furthermore, owing to the shrinking pores, the adsorption rates of CH4 and CO2 decrease with higher carbonization temperature.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Abanades, S., Abbaspour, H., Ahmadi, A., Das, B., Ehyaei, M.A., Esmaeilion, F., El Haj Assad, M., Hajilounezhad, T., Jamali, D.H., Hmida, A., Ozgoli, H.A., Safari, S., AlShabi, M., Bani-Hani, E.H.: A critical review of biogas production and usage with legislations framework across the globe. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19(4), 3377–3400 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03301-6 2. Mertins, A., Wawer, T.: How to use biogas? A systematic review of biogas utilization pathways and business models. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 9(1), 1–18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00545-z 3. Capra, F., Fettarappa, F., Magli, F., Gatti, M., Martelli, E.: Biogas upgrading by amine scrubbing: solvent comparison between MDEA and MDEA/MEA blend. Energy Procedia 148, 970–977 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.065 4. Huertas, J.I., Giraldo, N., Izquierdo, S.: Removal of H2S and CO2 from biogas by amine absorption. In: Marko, J. (ed.) Mass Transfer in Chemical Engineering Processes, pp. 133–150. IntechOpen, Rijeka (2011) 5. Li, Y., Alaimo, C.P., Kim, M., Kado, N.Y., Peppers, J., Xue, J., Wan, C., Green, P.G., Zhang, R., Jenkins, B.M., Vogel, C.F.A., Wuertz, S., Young, T.M., Kleeman, M.J.: Composition and toxicity of biogas produced from different feedstocks in California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53(19), 11569–11579 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03003
|
|