Defying description: searching for queer history in institutional archives

Author:

Freeman ElliotORCID

Abstract

AbstractThere are numerous obstacles to overcome when conducting queer historical research. While has been a steady increase in work to address the (in)visibility of queer histories and perspectives in institutional heritage collections, this work is often skewed towards outputs such as exhibitions or social media posts. As a result, very little work has been done to interrogate and transform the ways that these materials are managed and made accessible (or not). This paper considers how the lack of rich and explicit descriptive metadata shapes the (in)visibility and (in)accessibility of queer records within institutional archives. It reports the findings of a series of qualitative interviews I conducted with individuals who have searched for queer materials in archival collections in Australia. These interviews explored the practical process of searching for queer records in institutional archives; how researchers identify, locate, and access these records; and the challenges of this process—both in terms of a research methodology, and an experience for queer researchers within potentially hostile or unsafe spaces.

Funder

Monash University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,History

Reference74 articles.

1. Adler MA (2015) “Let’s not homosexualize the library stacks”: liberating gays in the library catalog. J Hist Sex 24(3):478–507

2. Adler MA (2017) Cruising the library: perversities in the organization of knowledge. Fordham University Press, New York City

3. Ajamu X, Campbell T, Stevens M (2009) Love and lubrication in the archives, or rukus! A Black queer archive for the United Kingdom. Archivaria 68:271–294

4. Arondekar A (2009) For the record. Duke University Press, Durham. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391029

5. Arondekar A (2017) Without a trace. In: Gilliland AJ, McKemmish S, Lau AJ (eds) Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing, Melbourne, pp 411–431

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3