Record DNA: reconceptualising digital records as the future evidence base

Author:

McLeod JulieORCID,Lomas ElizabethORCID

Abstract

AbstractA major issue facing society is the extent to which the usability of the digital evidence base is at risk because, in the digital era, the concept of the record has been eroded. The nature and reality of a record are no longer agreed. Addressing the challenges that the digital presents for managing records and assuring their future usability is not one that records and archives scholars and professionals can tackle alone. This article argues that this is a ‘grand challenge’ which requires a broad range of perspectives and expertise and convergence research to resolve. It discusses findings from an international multidisciplinary research network established to critically explore, through a grounded theory approach, the nature of a digital record and the implications of the digital era for the usability and functionality of the future evidence base. A series of different visions of a digital record emerged alongside a wide-ranging set of research questions that form the basis of an agenda for future collaborative (convergence) research.

Funder

Arts and Humanities Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,History

Reference128 articles.

1. Acker A (2017) When is a record? A research framework for locating electronic records in infrastructure. In: Gilliland A, McKemmish S, Lau A (eds) Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing, Clayton. Victoria, pp 288–323

2. Aïvodji U, Arai H, Fortineau O, Gambs S, Hara S, Tapp A (2019) Fairwashing: the risk of rationalization. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, Long Beach, California, PMLR 97, 2019

3. Andresen H (2020) A discussion frame for explaining records that are based on algorithmic output. Records Manag J 30:129–141

4. Bailey S (2008) Managing the crowd: rethinking records management for the Web 2.0 world. Facet, London

5. Baron JR, Attfield SJ (2012) Where light in darkness lies: Preservation, sensemaking, and access strategies for the modern digital archive. In: Duranti L, Shaffer e (eds) Proceedings of the UNESCO Memory of the World in the Digital Age Conference, 26–28 September 2012, Vancouver, BC. UNESCO, pp 580–595 Accessed 25 May 2022 at: http://www.ciscra.org/docs/UNESCO_MOW2012_Proceedings_FINAL_ENG_Compressed.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3