A metadata model for authenticity in digital archival descriptions

Author:

Pacheco AndréORCID,Da Silva Carlos GuardadoORCID,De Freitas Maria Cristina VieiraORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe advent of the information paradigm has shaken many of the principles of archival theory and practice. One key issue is knowing to which extent can digital information be trusted. Digital resources are represented by metadata, and trust consists in demonstrating their authenticity. Since the traditional elements used to verify the authenticity of analog records are not suitable in the digital world, the field faces a major challenge. The use of abundant, pertinent and constantly captured metadata seems to one of the most relevant solutions. This article aims to contribute to tackle this issue by setting the goal of proposing a model that attempts to include the most relevant metadata elements to capture the information that contributes for ascertaining the authenticity of digital archival descriptions. To that end, mixed methods methodology are employed. A qualitative documentary research is used to collect, analyze and interpret a corpus of scientific literature. As a complement, the quantitative technique requirements engineering is used to extract from international description standards the metadata requirements that can assist in the presumption of authenticity. Both approaches are then combined through a critical lens into a single unifying model for authenticity that is deemed as complete as necessary but as simple as possible. The model can be used by organizations or as a contribution to the discussion of authenticity and trustworthiness in digital archival descriptions.

Funder

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia

Universidade de Lisboa

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,History

Reference127 articles.

1. Acker A (2017) When is a record?: a research framework for locating electronic records in infrastructure. In: Gilliland A, McKemmish S, Lau A (eds) Research in the Archival Multiverse. Monash University Publishing, pp 286–323

2. Anchor R (2013) ‘More product, less process’: method, madness or practice? Arch & Rec 34(2):156–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.818937

3. Andrade M, Berti Júnior D, Pereira G, Baptista A (2014) Esquemas de metadados utilizados por repositórios digitais científicos e de objetos educacionais : estudo preliminar. Cadernos BAD 2:219–222

4. Apostolou C (2009) The role of metadata in managing knowledge. Loughborough University, UK

5. Baca M (ed) (2016) Introduction to metadata (3°). Getty Research Institute., California, USA

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3