Tieboutian clubs revisited

Author:

Heikkila Eric J.,Coutin JordyORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper examines the evolution of Tieboutian clubs over time and across metropolitan regions. We address this topic by examining a large set of socioeconomic characteristics of metropolitan regions to assess empirically whether and how those member attributes may figure into a Tiebout sorting process. The method entails factor analysis to reduce an initial set of forty-nine variables to a much smaller number of factors that represent groups of intercorrelated variables. An analysis of variance is then undertaken on the corresponding factor scores to assess whether census tracts within municipalities are more alike than those between municipalities. We do this for the Los Angeles metropolitan region using census data from 1970, 1990 and 2020, and we repeat the process for the twenty largest metropolitan regions (core-based statistical areas) in the USA for 2020. Several key results emerge from this analysis. While in most cases seven or eight factors emerge repeatedly, four are most persistent and ubiquitous; these pertain to economic class, race, age cohort and immigration status. These are, in effect, the most enduring fundamental aspects of the socioeconomic landscape in metropolitan regions in the USA. The final question addressed by our work links back to the original motivation, which is to assess the role of municipalities in the formation of these clubs. We do so for the twenty largest metropolitan regions in the USA. The results from our analyses of variance are compelling. With very few exceptions we find that census tracts with similar club characteristics have a strong tendency to be co-located within the same municipalities. This strong result holds regardless of which metropolitan region we examined, or which decade. This affirms that municipalities are indeed Tieboutian clubs.

Funder

University of Southern California

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3