Abstract
AbstractThis paper examines how integration affects Foreign Direct Investment location in relation to a newly internalised border. It focuses on the fifth European Union enlargement that integrated the Central and Eastern European Countries. Using a spatial autoregressive model, 35,103 FDI location decisions are analysed for Europe at a NUTS-2 regional level over 1997–2010. It finds no distance effect in FDI location prior to enlargement, but after this time FDI is 37% higher in the CEEC regions that are contiguous with the newly internalised border. This is not explained by a national border effect that occurs throughout the union, nor by a drop in FDI in the border regions of the old Member States, but rather it is consistent with improved market access from the removal of the border checks. Along the internalised border it amounts to an extra 60 FDI projects and 13,600 gross jobs per annum, which is up to 2000 investments in the long-run. The results have implications for economic development and cohesion of the enlarged union.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference53 articles.
1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Springer, Dordrecht
2. Baldwin RE, Francois JF, Portes R (1997) EU enlargement: small costs for the West, Big gains for the East. Econ Policy 12(April):125–176
3. Barjak F and Heimpold G (1999), Development problems and policies at the German border with Poland: Regional Aspects of Trade and Investment. Discussion Paper No. 101, Institute for Economic Research, Halle.
4. Basile R, Castellani D, Zanfei A (2008) Location choices of multinational firms in Europe: the role of EU cohesion policy. J Int Econ 74(2):328–340
5. Behrens K, Gaigne C, Ottaviano GIP, Thisse J-F (2007) Countries, Regions and trade: on the welfare impacts of economic integration. Eur Econ Rev 51(5):1277–301
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献