Abstract
AbstractIn many microeconometric studies distance from a relevant point of interest (such as a hospital) is often used as a predictor in a regression framework. Confidentiality rules, often, require to geo-mask spatial micro-data, reducing the quality of such relevant information and distorting inference on models’ parameters. This paper extends previous literature, extending the classical results on the measurement error in a linear regression model to the case of hospital choice, showing that in a discrete choice model the higher is the distortion produced by the geo-masking, the higher will be the downward bias in absolute value toward zero of the coefficient associated to the distance in the models. Monte Carlo simulations allow us to provide evidence of theoretical hypothesis. Results can be used by the data producers to choose the optimal value of the parameters of geo-masking preserving confidentiality, not destroying the statistical information.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference16 articles.
1. Aerts JC, Goodchild MF, Heuvelink G (2003) Accounting for spatial uncertainty in optimization with spatial decision support systems. Trans GIS 7(2):211–230
2. Arbia G et al (2016) Spatial econometrics: a broad view. Found Trends Econom 8(3–4):145–265
3. Arbia G, Espa G, Giuliani D (2015) Measurement errors arising when using distances in microeconometric modelling and the individuals’ position is geo-masked for confidentiality. Econometrics 3(4):709–718
4. Berta P, Martini G, Moscone F, Vittadini G (2016) The association between asymmetric information, hospital competition and quality of healthcare: evidence from Italy. J R Stat Soc A Stat Soc 179(4):907–926
5. Burgert CR, Colston J, Roy T, Zachary B (2013) Geographic displacement procedure and georeferenced data release policy for the demographic and health surveys