Author:
Govindasamy Mahadevan,Tamilkolundhu Senthilkumar,Nallamuthu Ramasamy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. M. Balasubramanian, V. Jayabalan, and V. Balasubramanian, A Mathematical Model to Predict Impact Toughness of Pulsed Current Gas Tungsten Arc Welded Titanium Alloy, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2008, 35(9–10), p 852–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0763-4
2. N. Anbarasan, R. Oyyaravelu, and P. Kuppan, Effect of GMAW Process Parameters on the Influence of Bead Geometry and HAZ Area on ASTM A516 Grade 70 Low Alloy, Int. J. Technol. Chem. Res, 2015, 1, p 1–10.
3. B. Liu, W. Jin, A. Lu, K. Liu, C. Wang, and G. Mi, Optimal Design for Dual Laser Beam Butt Welding Process Parameter Using Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithm for SUS316L Austenitic Stainless Steel, Opt. Laser Technol., 2020, 125, 106027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.106027
4. S. Jindal, R. Chhibber, and N.P. Mehta, Effect of Welding Parameters on Bead Profile, Microhardness and H2 Content in Submerged Arc Welding of High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B, 2014, 228(1), p 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405413495846
5. N. Saini, R.S. Mulik, and M.M. Mahapatra, Effect of Welding Process Parameters on Embrittlement of Grade P92 Steel Using Granjon Implant Testing of Welded Joints, Int. J. Hydr. Energy, 2020, 45(16), p 10189–10198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.146