Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism?

Published:2017-01-26 Issue:1 Volume:13 Page:
ISSN:1833-2595
Container-title:International Journal for Educational Integrity
language:en
Short-container-title:Int J Educ Integr

Author:

Rogerson Ann M.,McCarthy Grace

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40979-016-0013-y/fulltext.html

Reference60 articles.

1. Ambati V, Vogel S, and Carbonell JG (2010). Active learning and crowd-sourcing for machine translation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), Malta.

2. Atkinson D, Lim SL (2013) Improving assessment processes in Higher Education: Student and teacher perceptions of the effectiveness of a rubric embedded in a LMS. Australas J Educ Technol 29(5):651–666

3. Baggaley J, Spencer B (2005) The mind of a plagiarist. Learning, Media and Technology 30(1):55–62. doi: 10.1080/13581650500075587

4. Bailey C, Challen R (2015) Student perceptions of the value of Turnitin text-matching software as a learning tool. Practitioner Research in Higher Education 9(1):38–51

5. Bodie GD, Cannava KE, Vickery AJ (2016) Supportive communication and the adequate paraphrase. Commun Res Rep 33(2):166–172. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2016.1154839

Cited by 116 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Expressing Ideas: AI-Integrated Paraphrasing to Students’ Writing Skills;International Journal of Educational Methodology;2024-11-15

2. Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education;International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education;2024-09-09

3. AI-Powered Writing Tools: A Phenomenological Inquiry of Tertiary Students’ Usage;AsiaCALL Online Journal;2024-08-19

4. Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing;Education and Information Technologies;2024-07-31

5. Chegg’s Growth, Response Rate, and Prevalence as a Cheating Tool: Insights From an Audit within an Australian Engineering School;Journal of Academic Ethics;2024-07-31