Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference10 articles.
1. J. S. Bell:Physics,1, 195 (1965).
2. J. F. Clauser andA. Shimony:Rep. Prog. Phys.,41, 1881 (1978);A. Aspect, J. Dalibard andG. Roger:Phys. Rev. Lett.,49, 1804 (1982).
3. For the question of other possible assumptions involved, seeJ. F. Clauser andA. Shimony:Rep. Prog. Phys.,41, 1881 (1978);B. d’Espagnat:Sci. Am.,241(5), 128 (1979);H. P. Stapp:Found. Phys.,10, 767 (1980).
4. It is easily shown, however, that this effect cannot be used as a means for communicating between observers (see,e.g.,T. M. Helliwell andD. A. Konkowski:Am. J. Phys.,51, 996 (1983)).
5. This is, in fact, all that we can mean by the term «nonlocality» in the present context. Of course, of the many particles measured, there is no way for us to know which ones would have yielded different values in different circumstances. Nevertheless, the existence of the nonlocal effect can be established indirectly from the overall statistical results, as Bell’s proof demonstrates.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献