How Much “New” Public Is Too Much? The CJEU’s VG Bild-Kunst Judgment and Non-Exhaustive Control Over a Work’s Consumption

Abstract

AbstractPursuant to the EU copyrightacquis, right holders enjoy broad control over the communication of a work to the public. Following theVG Bild-Kunstjudgment of the CJEU, right holders can rely on copyright to preclude framing of their otherwise freely available works on other websites. Circumventing technical measures placed by the right holders to prevent framing infringes their exclusive right of communicating works to the public. The judgment not only constrains secondary communication of a work, but also de facto places restrictions on the consumption of lawfully communicated works. The CJEU’s reasoning builds upon the expansive interpretation of the “new public” criterion coined in the precedingRenckhoffcase. This paper argues that relying on the new public criterion inVG Bild-Kunstconcealed the relevant circumstances of the case. Fundamental questions of the extent of the right holder’s exclusive control over authorized communication and the circumstances of a work’s consumption remained unexplored. It is concluded that revising the scope of application of the new public criterion is in order. Restricting the new public test to secondary communication and access to a work in its strict sense will expose the fundamental normative questions and the need to consider the underlying objectives of the copyrightacquis.